Tag: 上海大龙凤419

Warning: sprintf(): Too few arguments in /www/wwwroot/shyllm.com/wp-content/themes/hotelflix/inc/breadcrumb.php on line 252

Government tries to reintroduce censorship about the security situation

first_img June 20, 2006 – Updated on January 20, 2016 Government tries to reintroduce censorship about the security situation Reporters Without Borders voiced dismay today at recent government initiatives aimed at imposing censorship and self-censorship about the security situation and the presence of foreign troops. News media editors and executives were summoned by intelligence officials and given instructions. Then a list of banned subjects was sent out to editors.”The media obviously have a role to play in promoting peace, but it is absolutely outrageous that the Afghan authorities should harass the privately-owned media in this manner and tell them what to say and write,” the press freedom organisation said. “Criticising the Afghan authorities or the coalition forces is not the same as condoning terrorism.”Reporters Without Borders continued: “We call on President Hamid Karzai to have this list of banned subjects officially withdrawn and to make sure the intelligence services do not interfere in media content again.”The organisation added: “It is not by censoring the press that the Afghan government will resolve the security problems or put a stop to all the criticism of the warlords and corruption.”Executives and editors of some 10 Afghan news media, including Kabul Weekly, Kilid, Sibat and Tolo TV, were summoned by Hassan Fakhri, an official with the National Security Directorate (NSD) to a meeting at its Kabul headquarters on 12 June. After making a few general remarks about the role of the media, Fakhri distributed a list of bans and restrictions for the media that was signed by NSD director Amrullah Saleh. Fakhri said it could not been copied or circulated.The media representatives present refused to accept the directive, describing it as a violation of the constitution. As a result the NSD sent a new version – with a few minor changes and no signature – out to the news media on 18 June.The list of bans and restrictions – a copy of which has been obtained by Reporters Without Borders – deals above all with security matters and could be a result of a special meeting which President Karzai held with his security advisors on 29 May, following anti-foreigner riots in Kabul. Karzai wanted to tell the media that they should not endanger national interests.The directive begins by ordering the media not to publish “interviews and reports which are against the presence in Afghanistan of the troops of the International Coalition forces and the ISAF (the NATO International Security Assistance Force).” It also tells journalists not to interview or film Taliban, not to read the “provocative statements of armed organizations,” not to demoralize the army, not to call the Mujahideen “warlords” and not to publish “reports and interviews that are against the government’s foreign policy.”As well as issuing bans, the directive calls on the media to disclose ” of the real face of terrorists” and to promote the “spirit of resistance and the bravery of the armed forces in the capital and provinces and particularly in the country’s border areas.”Reacting to media criticism, President Karzai’s spokesperson yesterday said the government had no intention of restricting the media and only wanted to “prevent the glorification of terrorism.”The Association of Independent Afghan Journalists is planning to stage a protest against the directive on 21 June. Its president, Rahimullah Samander, told Reporters Without Borders that the constitution and the press law in no way allowed such censorship. “Afghan journalists have been covering recent events in Kabul and the rest of the country very well, without sensationalism,” he insisted. June 2, 2021 Find out more News Help by sharing this information News News Follow the news on Afghanistan News AfghanistanAsia – Pacific Situation getting more critical for Afghan women journalists, report says to go further Related documents Instructions to the EditorsPDF – 27.72 KB AfghanistanAsia – Pacific RSF_en March 11, 2021 Find out more Organisation Afghanistan : “No just and lasting peace in Afghanistan without guarantees for press freedom” May 3, 2021 Find out more Receive email alerts RSF asks International Criminal Court to investigate murders of journalists in Afghanistanlast_img read more

Guardiola: Man City not ready for Premier League return

first_imgPep Guardiola fears his Manchester City players are not ready for the gruelling demands of the Premier League restart. Guardiola says Man City are not ready for punishing Premier League return Guardiola’s reigning champions will host Arsenal on Wednesday in the second game of the Premier League’s return to action following the coronavirus hiatus. City play again on Monday when Burnley come to the Etihad Stadium and the pace does not drop until the planned end of the season in late July.Advertisement Loading… “The way we are right now, I think other clubs and teams as well, if you ask me how the team is, I don’t know.”Guardiola said the game against Arsenal would show him what level of fitness his players had.“What we are worried about over the three weeks is the lack of preparation, not like in Germany or Spain, where they worked five or six weeks,” he said. “We know it is not enough but it is what it is.”– ‘Difficult time’ –Since the Premier League went into lockdown in March, Guardiola’s mother Dolors Sala Carrio has died, aged 82, after contracting the coronavirus.“All the people who lost family or friends, it’s a difficult time, but we have family to stay strong,” he said.While the French and Dutch top-flight seasons were cancelled because of the pandemic, football has returned in Germany, Spain and Italy.Now it is the Premier League’s turn to experience life during the virus, with matches played behind closed doors and twice-weekly testing for players among other new rules and regulations.Guardiola did not sound especially enthusiastic about the Premier League’s decision to return, but he acknowledged the need to minimise the financial fallout from the pandemic.“That is why we have to finish the season. We have to limit the economic damage to the clubs,” he said.“It is what it is. Everyone suffered during this situation, personally and economically, and we have to adapt.“The players are human. The health of the people is important but at the end, the Premier League, like in Spain, decided we have to play and we are going to play. “City, who resume 25 points behind leaders Liverpool, will welcome back Guardiola’s former assistant Mikel Arteta for the first time since he took charge of Arsenal in December.Pep Guardiola put his players through their paces this weekend.Read Also: Bundesliga: Awoniyi rules self out of Dortmund clash“We are delighted he will come back, especially if he is happy there. We sent a message about an hour and a half ago,” Guardiola said.“It was about the wine we are going to drink after the game if social distance allows.”FacebookTwitterWhatsAppEmail分享 center_img With Premier League chiefs determined to play the remaining 92 matches in less than six weeks and teams given only a short time to prepare, City manager Guardiola is concerned that his stars are not fully fit for such a hectic schedule. “We are ready to play one game, but three days after another and four days after another, we are not ready,” Guardiola told reporters in a video press conference on Tuesday. “We have to rotate and use all the players. You can play a game after three weeks on holiday but we spent two weeks on the sofa doing nothing much. That is why the players are not fully fit.last_img read more

EPL: Mourinho’s United Paid More Money than Champions City

first_imgIn total Premier League clubs received £2.42bn, £2.1m more than last season.Jose Mourinho’s United was shown live on UK television 28 times this season, the same number as Liverpool and Arsenal, with City screened 26 times.A club’s total payment is made up of UK broadcast revenue – of which 50% is shared equally between clubs, 25% is shared based on the number of live UK television matches, and 25% is based on league position – central commercial revenues and international broadcasting revenues.City received £38.63m for winning the league, £1.93m more than second-placed United.Share this:FacebookRedditTwitterPrintPinterestEmailWhatsAppSkypeLinkedInTumblrPocketTelegram Manchester United earned slightly more money than champions Manchester City from the Premier League last season, despite City’s record-breaking campaign.United, who finished second, received £149.77m, £328,491 more than City.United was paid more because two more of their matches were shown live in the UK – which meant their facilities fee was £2.26m higher.last_img read more